|
04 June 2010
Prof. Tim Morris, on behalf of horse owners said that the proposals were based on inaccurate facts and assumptions and the responsibility and cost sharing represents an additional cost for the horse sector since they have already been giving a significant proportion for these purposes through their tax. Furthermore, Morris said that he cannot see apparent benefits and therefore urges that authorities must not proceed with the bill in its current form.
Jan Rogers also said that the BEF has not heard anything from the equine sector who sees a single benefit on the levy, that is why it is not getting any support.
Meanwhile, Mark Weston expressed that the horse sector should not be compared with the livestock sector because it is mainly a leisure activity. Most horse owners have only one horse and they are not kept to make money and the horse industry does not receive any subsidy that the livestock industry receives, which is an estimated £1 billion annually.



Horse Finance News